Judy Heumann and Ed Roberts are both recognised as prominent figures in the international Independent Living Movement. It is remarkable to think that two complete strangers from opposite ends of the United States would come together to spearhead what would evolve into an International Disability Rights Movement. This month, as we mark the anniversaries of their passings (Judy β 4 March 2022; Ed β 14 March 1995), I find myself reflecting on how the actions of these two individuals led to the formation of an army (in modern terms, a collective), that fought for equal rights for disabled people worldwide.
When I first started working with Offaly Centre for Independent Living in 2008, my first assignment was to research and understand the origins of the Independent Living Movement. I knew about Personal Assistance, but nothing about the existence of a civil rights movement for disabled people. I also knew about Rosa Parksβ refusal to give up her seat on the bus, but Iβd never heard about the feisty New Yorker, Judy Heumann, who led a demonstration shutting down the streets of New York, before orchestrating what would become known as the β504 sit-inβ. Nor had I heard of a young Californian called Ed Roberts who conquered his self-pity and established the first Center for Independent Living, after setting up an informal team of assistants that helped him live independently while he studied at the University of California in Berkeley.
Ed and Judy (I refer to them by their first names as I think of them as comrades or allies, not faraway idols) are often referred to as the Father and Mother of the Independent Living Movement. Both had polio, but Ed had acquired polio later in life, at the age of fourteen, and so he perceived himself differently to how Judy did β his journey to self β acceptance saw him transform from βhelpless crippleβ into a βstarβ, whereas Judy says in her autobiography,Β Being Heumann,Β that she always believed that she had a right to exist on an equal basis with others. Ed was also more significantly impaired than Judy, and one of the obstacles to his attending university was finding somewhere that could accommodate the 800lb lung he slept inΒ at night. Ed was the first wheelchair user to attend the University of California and eventually, he was offered a wing of Cowell Hospital, the on-campus hospital, which he accepted with the caveat that he could treat it as a dorm, not a medical facility, with the same freedoms that non-disabled students enjoyed.
The establishment of the first Center for Independent Living in 1972, led by Ed and a group of disabled University of California students who dubbed themselves the Rolling Quads, marked the beginning of a battle for disabled people to have their civil rights recognised. By sharing their experiences and witnessing the nitty-gritty of each otherβs lives, they formed a strong bond among themselves based on a mutual desire to enjoy a better quality of life, as equal citizens in America. Progress proved slow. In 1973, the Rehabilitation Act was passed, but Section 504 β which rendered it illegal for state-funded services to discriminate against persons on the basis of disability β was vetoed. Age-old excuses of cost of adaptations were trotted out as valid reasons to not sign the regulations, so passing the Act was merely paying lip service to equality for disabled people.Β
By 1977, a frustrated Judy had had enough. In her eyes, and the eyes of her supporters and fellow activists, sitting around waiting for something drastic to happen was time wasted. Using her experience of successfully suing the State of New York for denying her a teaching licence as she was perceived to be a fire hazard, Judy and what was referred to at the time as an βarmy of the handicappedβ gained access to and refused to leave the offices of Health, Welfare and Education in San Francisco. Judy was highly organised, and soon various committees had been established to organise food and bedding, as well as entertainment. Nonetheless, the physical impact of sleeping on mattresses on the floor was roughly felt by many protestors, many of whom developed bedsores. Despite this, it seemed that the protestors in San Francisco knew that there was too much at stake to back down.
In the later stages of the sit-in, Evan White, a news reporter, had amassed an impressive amount of footage of the protests. He described his jubilance at having the honour of sitting in during βmeetings of strategyβ with disabled protestors, as Judy led long meetings with fellow protestors every evening that often lasted into the wee morning hours. Everyone was given a say, and a job to do. By a stroke of luck, a nationwide television strike enabled Evanβs recorded reports to become front and centre of the countryβs viewing schedule. This worried Califano more than the sit-ins themselves; it had the potential to damage his public image as a politician. On the twenty-fourth day of the sit-in, Section 504 was signed, a feat that was achieved by the will and determination of a strong collective of disabled people. (If you want to find out more about this sit-in, I recommend watching the award-winningΒ Crip CampΒ on Netflix).Β
Indeed, if we as activists can learn anything from Ed and Judy, it is that disabled people working together is the best way to attain our human rights. Having experienced discrimination and exclusion firsthand, we know best what we need. Although our lives are better than they were fifty years ago, we still battle to hold onto those hard-won rights that activists such as Ed and Judy, and here in Ireland, that Martin Naughton, Michael McCabe, Dermot Walsh, Ursula Hegarty and so many others fought for us to have. We must also come to accept that we work best as a collective. Nothing will change if we wallow in self-pity. Instead, we must use our experiences to make a better, more inclusive future for all of us. We owe it to Judy and Ed, and we owe it to ourselves, to never settle for a lesser life than the one we aspire to.
